Summation by Jurisdiction Click to View Summation Overview Click to View

General Government Services (1) N (3) Mean (2) Median Std. Deviation Skewness Road maintenance 597.7 4.09 4.00 1.08 (1.00) Revitalizing older neighborhoods 593.2 3.36 3.00 1.23 (0.22) Flood control 594.5 3.70 4.00 1.25 (0.60) Budget management 590.4 4.11 5.00 1.15 (1.19) Communicate Clark County's local government views about Yucca Mountain to federal decision makers 576.1 3.63 4.00 1.37 (0.61) Monitor and report to the public on how well government services are being performed 595 3.87 4.00 1.20 (0.83) Water conservation programs 596.8 4.22 5.00 1.09 (1.43) Quality of drinking water 594.1 3.99 4.00 1.22 (1.11) Recreational opportunities 596.3 3.83 4.00 1.07 (0.72) Parks and recreation programs 595.7 4.04 4.00 1.03 (1.02Z) 1) Ranking 1-5: 1 Being "Low Importance" and 5 Being "High Importance;" 2) Mean is the average score reported from all respondents; and 3) N represents the number of observations.

Social and Judicial Services (1) N (3) Mean (2) Median Std. Deviation Skewness Providing child protection services 592.5 4.17 5.00 1.14 (1.22) Providing child welfare services 591.4 3.99 4.00 1.22 (1.01) Providing juvenile justice services 581 3.98 4.00 1.15 (0.93) Providing attainable housing for working class families 590.8 3.76 4.00 1.33 (0.75) Providing affordable housing for low income families 590.6 3.67 4.00 1.34 (0.64) Providing shelter for the homeless 596.1 3.53 4.00 1.44 (0.56) Providing affordable housing for seniors 588.5 4.02 4.00 1.18 (1.05) Providing medical care for the poor 594.3 3.75 4.00 1.36 (0.76) Providing 24 hour emergency trauma care 596.1 4.42 5.00 0.97 (1.83) 1) Ranking 1-5: 1 Being "Low Importance" and 5 Being "High Importance;" 2) Mean is the average score reported from all respondents; and 3) N represents the number of observations.

Public Safety (1) N (3) Mean (2) Median Std. Deviation Skewness Providing crime prevention programs 595 4.04 4.00 1.11 (1.04) Enforcing traffic laws 599.6 4.09 4.00 1.09 (1.11) Maintaining a low crime rate 598.7 4.24 5.00 1.11 (1.41) Maintaining neighborhood police patrols 597.2 4.06 4.00 1.16 (1.17) Keeping police response times low 589.9 4.34 5.00 1.04 (1.68) Keeping fire department response times low 593.1 4.59 5.00 0.75 (2.03) Keeping paramedic and emergency medical response times low 591.5 4.61 5.00 0.73 (2.18) Well trained paramedic and emergency medical response personnel 590 4.67 5.00 0.63 (2.09) Facilitate neighborhood watch programs 586.4 3.79 4.00 1.17 (0.70) Preparing for natural disasters (i.e. floods, earthquakes, etc.) 586.9 3.84 4.00 1.19 (0.78) Preparing for man made (such as hazardous or radiological materials) accidents or terrorist event 588 4.03 4.00 1.20 (1.09) Investigating criminal activity 594.3 4.18 4.00 1.02 (1.20) Providing fire protection and prevention services 595.9 4.33 5.00 0.93 (1.48) Providing emergency medical services 594.8 4.51 5.00 0.79 (1.70) Providing for neighborhood code enforcement services 571.3 3.51 4.00 1.24 (0.43) Examining potential impacts from Yucca Mountain nuclear waste shipments 571.1 3.66 4.00 1.42 (0.66) Regional justice services and facilities 580.7 3.69 4.00 1.11 (0.54) 1) Ranking 1-5: 1 Being "Low Importance" and 5 Being "High Importance;" 2) Mean is the average score reported from all respondents; and 3) N represents the number of observations.

Community Development (1) N (3) Mean (2) Median Std. Deviation Skewness Providing affordable housing 589.9 3.64 4.00 1.39 (0.60) Managing growth 595.2 3.83 4.00 1.37 (0.85) Increasing job opportunities 592.5 3.84 4.00 1.22 (0.81) Improving the business climate 587.7 3.76 4.00 1.08 (0.59) Planning for commercial development 591.7 3.55 4.00 1.20 (0.48) Reducing traffic congestion 599.2 3.97 5.00 1.31 (1.01) Access to freeways 597.2 3.83 4.00 1.22 (0.89) Improving road conditions 596.1 3.95 4.00 1.17 (0.96) Reducing travel time 589.9 3.82 4.00 1.27 (0.79) Providing mass public transit 590.5 3.69 4.00 1.31 (0.61) Adequate airport facilities 593.7 3.87 4.00 1.19 (0.85) Overall sense of preparedness in the event of a large scale natural or man-made emergency 582.2 3.98 4.00 1.19 (0.98) Condition of streets and roads 598.7 3.96 4.00 1.08 (0.79) Availability of public transportation 590.7 3.44 4.00 1.32 (0.40) Housing affordability 594.1 3.56 4.00 1.35 (0.44) Air quality 598.7 4.04 4.00 1.16 (1.08) Availability of job opportunities 592.1 3.76 4.00 1.20 (0.72) 1) Ranking 1-5: 1 Being "Low Importance" and 5 Being "High Importance;" 2) Mean is the average score reported from all respondents; and 3) N represents the number of observations.

Importance Frequency Tables

On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Road maintenance Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 296 49.3 49.5 49.5 4 122 20.4 20.5 70.0 3 138 23.0 23.1 93.0 2 21 3.5 3.6 96.6 1 20 3.4 3.4 100.0 Total 598 99.7 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 2 .3 Total 600 100.0   On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Revitalizing older neighborhoods Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 141 23.5 23.7 23.7 4 114 19.0 19.2 42.9 3 207 34.5 34.9 77.8 2 79 13.2 13.4 91.1 1 53 8.8 8.9 100.0 Total 593 98.9 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 6 1.1 Total 600 100.0

On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Flood control Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 215 35.8 36.1 36.1 4 128 21.4 21.6 57.7 3 151 25.1 25.3 83.0 2 59 9.9 10.0 93.0 1 42 6.9 7.0 100.0 Total 595 99.1 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 5 .9 Total 600 100.0   On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Budget management Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 304 50.7 51.5 51.5 4 134 22.4 22.8 74.2 3 90 14.9 15.2 89.4 2 35 5.9 5.9 95.4 1 27 4.6 4.6 100.0 Total 590 98.5 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 9 1.5 Total 600 100.0

On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Communicate Clark County's local government views about Yucca Mountain to federal decision makers Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 218 36.4 37.8 37.8 4 112 18.6 19.4 57.2 3 126 21.0 21.9 79.1 2 55 9.1 9.5 88.6 1 66 11.0 11.4 100.0 Total 576 96.1 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 24 3.9 Total 600 100.0   On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Monitor and report to the public on how well government services are being performed Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 245 40.9 41.2 41.2 4 140 23.3 23.5 64.7 3 133 22.2 22.4 87.1 2 41 6.8 6.9 94.0 1 36 5.9 6.0 100.0 Total 595 99.2 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 5 .8 Total 600 100.0

On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Water conservation programs Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 332 55.4 55.7 55.7 4 141 23.5 23.6 79.3 3 72 12.0 12.1 91.4 2 27 4.5 4.6 95.9 1 24 4.1 4.1 100.0 Total 597 99.5 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 3 .5 Total 600 100.0   On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Providing child protection services Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 337 56.2 56.8 56.8 4 100 16.7 16.9 73.7 3 98 16.3 16.5 90.2 2 34 5.7 5.8 96.0 1 24 4.0 4.0 100.0 Total 593 98.8 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 7 1.2 Total 600 100.0

On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Providing child welfare services Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 287 47.9 48.6 48.6 4 121 20.1 20.4 69.0 3 108 18.0 18.2 87.2 2 40 6.6 6.7 93.9 1 36 6.0 6.1 100.0 Total 591 98.6 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 8 1.4 Total 600 100.0   On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Providing juvenile justice services Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 264 44.0 45.4 45.4 4 134 22.3 23.0 68.4 3 120 20.0 20.6 89.0 2 39 6.4 6.7 95.6 1 25 4.2 4.4 100.0 Total 581 96.9 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 19 3.1 Total 600 100.0

On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Providing attainable housing for working class families Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 245 40.9 41.5 41.5 4 127 21.1 21.4 62.9 3 105 17.6 17.8 80.8 2 61 10.1 10.3 91.0 1 53 8.8 9.0 100.0 Total 591 98.5 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 9 1.5 Total 600 100.0   On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Providing affordable housing for low income families Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 223 37.2 37.8 37.8 4 138 23.0 23.4 61.2 3 96 16.0 16.3 77.4 2 78 13.0 13.2 90.6 1 56 9.3 9.4 100.0 Total 591 98.5 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 9 1.5 Total 600 100.0

On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Providing shelter for the homeless Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 213 35.5 35.8 35.8 4 128 21.3 21.4 57.2 3 107 17.8 17.9 75.0 2 61 10.1 10.2 85.2 1 88 14.7 14.8 100.0 Total 596 99.4 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 4 .6 Total 600 100.0   On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Providing affordable housing for seniors Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 282 46.9 47.8 47.8 4 140 23.4 23.9 71.7 3 91 15.2 15.5 87.2 2 46 7.7 7.8 95.0 1 29 4.9 5.0 100.0 Total 588 98.1 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 11 1.9 Total 600 100.0

On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Providing medical care for the poor Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 252 42.0 42.3 42.3 4 128 21.3 21.5 63.8 3 91 15.1 15.3 79.1 2 64 10.7 10.8 89.9 1 60 10.0 10.1 100.0 Total 594 99.1 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 5 .9 Total 600 100.0   On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Providing 24 hour emergency trauma care Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 389 64.8 65.2 65.2 4 118 19.6 19.7 85.0 3 55 9.2 9.3 94.2 2 18 3.1 3.1 97.3 1 16 2.6 2.7 100.0 Total 596 99.4 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 4 .6 Total 600 100.0

On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Providing crime prevention programs Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 272 45.4 45.7 45.7 4 160 26.7 27.0 72.7 3 102 17.0 17.1 89.8 2 39 6.5 6.6 96.3 1 22 3.7 3.7 100.0 Total 595 99.2 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 5 .8 Total 600 100.0   On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Enforcing traffic laws Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 289 48.3 48.3 48.3 4 153 25.5 25.5 73.8 3 102 17.1 17.1 90.8 2 33 5.5 5.5 96.3 1 22 3.7 3.7 100.0 Total 600 100.0 100.0

On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Maintaining a low crime rate Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 355 59.3 59.3 59.3 4 115 19.2 19.2 78.6 3 69 11.5 11.5 90.1 2 37 6.2 6.2 96.3 1 22 3.6 3.7 100.0 Total 599 99.8 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 1 .2 Total 600 100.0   On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Maintaining neighborhood police patrols Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 288 48.0 48.2 48.2 4 158 26.3 26.4 74.6 3 81 13.6 13.6 88.2 2 39 6.5 6.5 94.8 1 31 5.2 5.2 100.0 Total 597 99.6 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 2 .4 Total 600 100.0

On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Keeping police response times low Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 366 61.0 62.0 62.0 4 121 20.2 20.6 82.6 3 60 10.0 10.2 92.8 2 21 3.6 3.6 96.4 1 21 3.5 3.6 100.0 Total 590 98.4 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 10 1.6 Total 600 100.0   On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Keeping fire department response times low Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 422 70.4 71.2 71.2 4 116 19.4 19.6 90.8 3 39 6.5 6.5 97.3 2 13 2.1 2.2 99.5 1 3 .5 .5 100.0 Total 593 98.9 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 7 1.1 Total 600 100.0

On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Keeping paramedic and emergency medical response times low Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 430 71.7 72.6 72.6 4 112 18.7 18.9 91.6 3 38 6.3 6.4 97.9 2 8 1.4 1.4 99.3 1 4 .7 .7 100.0 Total 592 98.6 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 8 1.4 Total 600 100.0   On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Well trained paramedic and emergency medical response personnel Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 438 73.1 74.2 74.2 4 118 19.7 20.0 94.3 3 26 4.4 4.4 98.7 2 7 1.2 1.2 99.9 1 0 .1 .1 100.0 Total 590 98.4 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 10 1.6 Total 600 100.0

On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Facilitate neighborhood watch programs Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 212 35.3 36.1 36.1 4 153 25.6 26.1 62.2 3 141 23.5 24.1 86.3 2 50 8.3 8.5 94.8 1 31 5.1 5.2 100.0 Total 586 97.8 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 13 2.2 Total 600 100.0   On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Preparing for natural disasters (i.e. floods, earthquakes, etc.) Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 228 38.0 38.8 38.8 4 151 25.2 25.8 64.6 3 126 21.1 21.6 86.1 2 49 8.2 8.4 94.5 1 32 5.4 5.5 100.0 Total 587 97.9 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 13 2.1 Total 600 100.0

On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Preparing for man made (such as hazardous or radiological materials) accidents or terrorist event Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 290 48.4 49.4 49.4 4 126 21.1 21.5 70.9 3 103 17.2 17.5 88.4 2 34 5.6 5.7 94.1 1 35 5.8 5.9 100.0 Total 588 98.1 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 12 1.9 Total 600 100.0   On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Investigating criminal activity Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 295 49.2 49.7 49.7 4 168 28.1 28.3 78.0 3 85 14.2 14.4 92.4 2 32 5.3 5.4 97.7 1 14 2.3 2.3 100.0 Total 594 99.1 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 5 .9 Total 600 100.0

On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Providing fire protection and prevention services Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 334 55.7 56.1 56.1 4 165 27.5 27.6 83.7 3 66 10.9 11.0 94.7 2 21 3.6 3.6 98.3 1 10 1.7 1.7 100.0 Total 596 99.4 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 4 .6 Total 600 100.0   On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Providing emergency medical services Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 392 65.3 65.9 65.9 4 132 22.1 22.3 88.1 3 57 9.5 9.6 97.7 2 10 1.7 1.7 99.3 1 4 .7 .7 100.0 Total 595 99.2 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 5 .8 Total 600 100.0

On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Providing for neighborhood code enforcement services Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 162 26.9 28.3 28.3 4 127 21.2 22.3 50.5 3 175 29.1 30.6 81.1 2 58 9.7 10.2 91.3 1 50 8.3 8.7 100.0 Total 571 95.3 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 28 4.7 Total 600 100.0   On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Examining potential impacts from Yucca Mountain nuclear waste shipments Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 235 39.2 41.1 41.1 4 106 17.7 18.6 59.7 3 102 17.0 17.9 77.6 2 55 9.2 9.6 87.3 1 73 12.1 12.7 100.0 Total 571 95.2 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 29 4.8 Total 600 100.0

On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Regional justice services and facilities Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 162 27.1 28.0 28.0 4 180 30.1 31.0 59.0 3 156 26.1 26.9 85.9 2 57 9.6 9.9 95.8 1 24 4.1 4.2 100.0 Total 581 96.8 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 19 3.2 Total 600 100.0   On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Providing affordable housing Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 235 39.2 39.8 39.8 4 106 17.7 18.0 57.8 3 116 19.4 19.7 77.5 2 67 11.2 11.4 88.9 1 65 10.9 11.1 100.0 Total 590 98.4 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 10 1.6 Total 600 100.0

On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Managing growth Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 282 47.1 47.4 47.4 4 103 17.2 17.3 64.8 3 97 16.2 16.3 81.1 2 53 8.9 9.0 90.0 1 59 9.9 10.0 100.0 Total 595 99.3 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 4 .7 Total 600 100.0   On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Increasing job opportunities Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 238 39.6 40.1 40.1 4 151 25.1 25.4 65.5 3 112 18.6 18.8 84.4 2 56 9.4 9.5 93.9 1 36 6.1 6.1 100.0 Total 593 98.8 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 7 1.2 Total 600 100.0

On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Improving the business climate Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 177 29.5 30.1 30.1 4 185 30.9 31.5 61.6 3 154 25.7 26.2 87.8 2 51 8.6 8.7 96.6 1 20 3.4 3.4 100.0 Total 588 98.0 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 12 2.0 Total 600 100.0   On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Planning for commercial development Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 156 26.0 26.4 26.4 4 167 27.9 28.3 54.6 3 155 25.9 26.2 80.9 2 71 11.8 12.0 92.8 1 42 7.1 7.2 100.0 Total 592 98.7 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 8 1.3 Total 600 100.0

On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Reducing traffic congestion Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 313 52.3 52.3 52.3 4 103 17.2 17.2 69.5 3 81 13.6 13.6 83.1 2 56 9.3 9.3 92.4 1 45 7.6 7.6 100.0 Total 599 99.9 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 0 .1 Total 600 100.0   On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Access to freeways Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 225 37.6 37.7 37.7 4 177 29.5 29.6 67.4 3 106 17.6 17.7 85.1 2 46 7.6 7.6 92.7 1 44 7.3 7.3 100.0 Total 597 99.6 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 2 .4 Total 600 100.0

On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Improving road conditions Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 259 43.2 43.5 43.5 4 153 25.4 25.6 69.1 3 112 18.8 18.9 87.9 2 40 6.7 6.7 94.6 1 32 5.3 5.4 100.0 Total 596 99.4 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 4 .6 Total 600 100.0   On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Reducing travel time Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 249 41.6 42.3 42.3 4 131 21.9 22.3 64.5 3 106 17.7 18.0 82.5 2 62 10.3 10.5 93.0 1 42 6.9 7.0 100.0 Total 590 98.4 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 10 1.6 Total 600 100.0

On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Providing mass public transit Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 227 37.9 38.5 38.5 4 118 19.6 19.9 58.4 3 127 21.3 21.6 80.0 2 69 11.4 11.6 91.6 1 50 8.3 8.4 100.0 Total 591 98.5 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 9 1.5 Total 600 100.0   On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Adequate airport facilities Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 238 39.7 40.1 40.1 4 154 25.6 25.9 65.9 3 126 21.0 21.2 87.1 2 42 6.9 7.0 94.1 1 35 5.8 5.9 100.0 Total 594 99.0 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 6 1.0 Total 600 100.0

On a scale of one to five, where one means "low importance" and five means "high importance," please rate the level of importance for the following services: Parks and recreation programs Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 247 41.2 41.5 41.5 4 192 32.0 32.2 73.7 3 112 18.6 18.7 92.4 2 27 4.4 4.5 96.9 1 19 3.1 3.1 100.0 Total 596 99.3 100.0 Missing DK/No answer 4 .7 Total 600 100.0